HER2NI symbol HER2NI RESEARCH
Interaction Observability & Evaluation for LLM & Multi-Agent AI Systems
Model-agnostic interaction telemetry for analysing trajectory stability, drift, contradiction, and coordination dynamics in complex AI systems.
Designed to complement existing model-level evaluation metrics with interaction-level observability (evidence-only layer; no model modification).
HER2NI is a model-agnostic interaction-infrastructure telemetry protocol for coherence dynamics in complex distributed systems.
The protocol is an observability/telemetry layer; it does not prescribe actions or enforce outcomes.
ACTIVE RESEARCH PROTOCOL

EXAMPLE STATE:  


Cs ≈ 0.83 · Ss ≈ 0.91 · Hs ≈ 0.88  
Hs(t) ≈ 0.72  
HER2NI Portal (Prototype)
Open · Local backend required · Research demo
HER helix

HER2NI: Human–Emergent Resonance to Neural Intelligence

HER2NI is a protocol for representing, encoding, and exchanging coherence metrics between humans and AI systems. It defines model-agnostic metrics for interaction stability and provides a foundation for safety-aligned human–AI collaboration.

HER2NI Coherence (Cs, Ss, Hs) & Trajectory Hs(t) Metrics
Interaction Stability Safety-Oriented AI Model-Agnostic Protocol
Research Focus

HER2NI provides interaction-level observability across multi-turn AI systems.

  • Defining interaction-level coherence metrics for human–AI interaction.
  • Detecting drift, contradiction, and collapse in multi-turn dialogue.
  • Studying coherence scaffolding dynamics in multi-turn interaction.
  • Providing open, implementation-agnostic specifications for evaluation.

Current Focus: Coherence Geometry in Human–AI Interaction

Current research examines how HER2NI coherence metrics detect and characterise the geometric structure of stability, drift, and contradiction in complex, recursive dialogues. By mapping these dynamics in real time, we aim to measure and characterise stability, drift, and contradiction patterns to support safer evaluation and human oversight. The objective is to establish reliable operational regimes for LLM systems functioning under high cognitive or emotional load, improving safety, consistency, and the effectiveness of modulation frameworks used in adaptive dialogue.

Active Lines of Inquiry
  • Detecting early interaction drift and collapse using Hs(t) trajectories.
  • Characterising ambiguity and metaphor in cross-linguistic interaction (no mental-state inference).
  • Evaluating tone, pacing, and abstraction adjustments under high-cognitive-load operational dialogue.
  • Providing metrics & tools to complement existing AI assurance and safety evaluation.
Operational & Evaluation Context
  • Designed to complement existing AI risk assessment and governance frameworks.
  • Applicable to single-agent, multi-agent, and human–AI interaction settings.
  • Focused on early warning signals rather than post-hoc incident analysis.
  • Intended for research, evaluation, and safety-aligned deployment contexts.
Demo

H.E.R — Live interaction visualisation →
Visual-only research artefact; does not capture, store, or evaluate live systems.

Open Interaction Telemetry Demo →

A minimal, static interaction-telemetry illustration (mock JSON; no backend). Metrics shown are descriptive only and do not constitute a safety determination.

Licensed Implementation

HER₂™ is the licensed forensic evidence system built on the HER2NI research protocol family. It produces verifiable interaction integrity records and evidence bundles suitable for audit, due diligence, and post-incident reconstruction.

HER₂™ — Forensic Evidence System for Artificial Intelligence (licensed engagement) →

HER₂™ — Forensic Evidence Pack Overview (PDF) →

Note: HER₂™ is an evidence layer. It preserves interaction artifacts; it does not certify compliance, judge correctness, or enforce outcomes unless separately contracted.

As interactive AI systems move from isolated models to networked, multi-agent deployments, new governance and safety challenges emerge that are not addressed by model-level evaluation alone.

Policy Relevance & Governance Context

HER2NI is designed to support existing public-sector and responsible-AI governance frameworks. It does not introduce new enforcement mechanisms, optimisation objectives, or automated decision authority.

Instead, HER2NI functions as an observational telemetry layer that can complement risk-based approaches to AI assurance, safety evaluation, and human oversight. All interpretation, intervention, and decision-making remain the responsibility of human operators and institutions.

Adoption is intentionally incremental. Metrics can be introduced experimentally, evaluated alongside existing monitoring, and discontinued without architectural disruption. If HER2NI does not provide useful signals in a given context, that outcome is itself informative.

HER2NI is therefore suitable for case-scoped engagements, research programs, and early-stage regulatory engagement where increased observability is more valuable than post-hoc explanation.

HER2NI does not claim authority, certification status, or compliance determination. It provides observational telemetry intended to inform, not replace, existing evaluation and governance processes.

Why This Matters

As AI systems increasingly operate as networks of interacting components and agents, many risks emerge not from individual model behaviour, but from interaction dynamics. These include coordination breakdowns, cascading failures, over-alignment, and loss of effective human oversight.

Existing evaluation and governance approaches primarily assess models, outputs, or downstream impacts. HER2NI addresses a complementary gap by providing interaction-level observability—enabling earlier detection of instability before failures propagate or become externally visible.

HER2NI Metrics

HER2NI introduces three core metrics for cross-substrate cognitive alignment, together with an interaction-trajectory representation:

  • Cs — Human-side coherence score: human cognitive coherence and interaction stability.
  • Ss — Silicon Score: model-side processing load and reasoning intensity.
  • Hs — HER Score: emergent resonance between human and AI states at a given interaction point.
  • Hs(t) — Interaction Trajectory: the temporal evolution of resonance across multi-turn interaction.

Together, these metrics enable trajectory-level analysis of stability, drift, and breakdown in human–AI interaction, providing an early-warning and evaluation framework that goes beyond static outputs or single-turn assessments.

Example Coherence State

The following illustrates a stable, high-coherence interaction scenario computed using HER2NI metrics at a representative point along an interaction trajectory.

  • Cs ≈ 0.83 — stable human cognitive state
  • Ss ≈ 0.91 — deep but stable model reasoning load
  • Hs ≈ 0.88 — strong cross-substrate resonance

Illustrative example only. Values shown are not derived from a deployed system. In practice, HER2NI evaluates the temporal evolution of these values as Hs(t) to assess stability, drift, and breakdown across interaction over time.

Implementation & Integration
HER2NI Packet Schema (CBOR) HER-State Drift & Collapse Markers AOME Behaviour Modulation HER-Crystal Visualisation Modes

The protocol is implementation-agnostic: HER2NI can be integrated into existing LLM systems, agent frameworks, or evaluation pipelines.
Reference implementations are released commercially as HER₂™ on her2.ai.

Collaboration

HER2NI Research is open to collaborations with:

For direct correspondence or research enquiries, please contact research@her2ni.ai.